{"id":882,"date":"2009-08-01T13:40:48","date_gmt":"2009-08-01T20:40:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/?p=882"},"modified":"2009-08-01T13:50:41","modified_gmt":"2009-08-01T20:50:41","slug":"the-blind-eye-of-dan-amrich","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/?p=882","title":{"rendered":"The blind eye of Dan Amrich?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Joystiq&#8217;s Justin McElroy wrote a very fair rebuttal to <a href=\"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/?p=879\">my last post<\/a> about the two-week black hole in online news reporting about the GH5 Avatar thing. Not to kiss up, but I actually think Joystiq&#8217;s attitude and ethic is as good as it gets online (they cite sources and check facts and everything!) and as a reader who has read a lot of their articles, I trust them as an online news source above most others. But I called them out as a negative example in the story because a) it was relevant to the topic and b) there are two high-profile\/influential news blogs in my estimation, and Joystiq is one of them. Just because I like &#8217;em doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m not going to occasionally criticize &#8217;em. (The fact that Justin wrote back says a lot too.)<\/p>\n<p>Also, a side note: on my personal blog, I&#8217;m not wearing my fair and balanced press hat, and nobody&#8217;s editing my from-the-hip rants. Justin was right to disagree with my spiteful stretch at the end there. But this being my personal domain does not mean I&#8217;m intentionally trying to be a flame-baiting irrational jerk either. I&#8217;m personally responsible for what I say here and I accept all criticism; I haven&#8217;t spiked any disagreeing comments. It would be tough to talk about things like the importance of respect for multiple viewpoints without actually respecting multiple viewpoints. <\/p>\n<p>But Justin&#8217;s note made me think about why I wanted to post the GH5 thing in the first place, and that led me to admit that I&#8217;m simply biased and sensitive when it comes to the online\/print relationship. I think, in broad terms, the former often devalues the latter unfairly. Many of my mini-rants about the media suggest or illustrate this, so this might not be news to you. Sometimes it&#8217;s a small thing, like an offhanded hopeful comment about how print is doomed; other times it&#8217;s bigger, like improper\/incorrect citing, a lack of original research\/reporting, or outright willful ignorance. I know the value of both online and print; I only get my knickers in a twist when someone who doesn&#8217;t tries to influence the masses one way or the other. That&#8217;s when I am more likely to point out flaws in the new system that do not exist in the old. The difference between evolution and extinction is not being explained, so I often come forward to try, and I usually do it with some venom. <\/p>\n<p>So yeah, having worked in both online and print (I am so frequently a defender of print that I think a lot of people forget that I got my start in online, and most recently helped launch GamesRadar in the US), I get bitter when online sites don&#8217;t get the basics right. Maybe I should celebrate more positive examples going forward. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Joystiq&#8217;s Justin McElroy wrote a very fair rebuttal to my last post about the two-week black hole in online news reporting about the GH5 Avatar thing. Not to kiss up, but I actually think Joystiq&#8217;s attitude and ethic is as &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/?p=882\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/882"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=882"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/882\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":884,"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/882\/revisions\/884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}