{"id":672,"date":"2009-02-14T00:10:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-14T07:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/?p=672"},"modified":"2009-02-14T00:10:57","modified_gmt":"2009-02-14T07:10:57","slug":"killzone-2-edge-and-lies-with-a-bit-of-irony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/?p=672","title":{"rendered":"Killzone 2, Edge, and &#8220;lies&#8221; (with a bit of irony)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This week&#8217;s scathing gaming editorial comes from PSXExtreme. Ben Dutka <a href=\"http:\/\/www.psxextreme.com\/ps3-news\/4586.html\" target=\"_blank\">wrote a response<\/a> to <em>Edge <\/em>magazine&#8217;s <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge-online.com\/magazine\/killzone-2-the-edge-verdict\" target=\"_blank\">Killzone 2<\/a><\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.edge-online.com\/magazine\/killzone-2-the-edge-verdict\" target=\"_blank\"> review<\/a>. <em>Edge <\/em>is notoriously harsh in its reviews, but many people did not expect a 7 out of 10.<\/p>\n<p>Ben&#8217;s rebuttal is really worth reading, because it is so strongly emotional and personal, yet tries to present itself as professional critique. It fails at that completely. \u00c2\u00a0It&#8217;s a biased overreaction in the context of being rational and objective, and I think that&#8217;s why it got so many people upset. Its main tenet is &#8220;but they&#8217;re wrong because we all <em>know <\/em>they&#8217;re wrong, and that&#8217;s proof enough.&#8221; The irony is staggering; he&#8217;s accusing <em>Edge <\/em>of doing all this stuff and in accusing, he does it himself.\u00c2\u00a0The wording, the inflexible attitude, the intentional lack of a link to the very story that outraged him&#8230;yeah, it&#8217;s not exactly what I would defend as professional.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>And yet it was defended! In the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.psxextreme.com\/feature\/378.html\" target=\"_blank\">follow-up article<\/a>, the site&#8217;s executive editor defends the author as not a teenaged fanboy and, in fact, a 31-year-old who really likes his Xbox 360.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0The fact that the author is not the petulant teenager he sounds like in the original post is actually kind of worse.\u00c2\u00a0But I do sympathize with the guy&#8217;s site being called &#8220;a fanboy site&#8221; simply people read something on it that they did not like, and called it names because it is focuses on a single platform and has a name that reflects its focus. Oh boy, do I sympathize with that. But then he ruins it by not apologizing for Ben&#8217;s rage-fueled choplogic, instead saying, hey,\u00c2\u00a0<em>Edge<\/em>\u00c2\u00a0is still wrong, and then he gets back to defending the site with its previous, unbiased articles, presumably so he doesn&#8217;t lose readers. It kind of reads like a CYA move, regardless of what his intentions might have been. Guess it&#8217;s a no-win, really.<\/p>\n<p>So, in summary, they didn&#8217;t like the <em>Edge <\/em>review because it is &#8220;a lie.&#8221; And when you say you disagree with their review of that review as irrational itself, they say &#8220;no, you&#8217;re wrong, because Edge is wrong. And also, read our unbiased content, thanks.&#8221;\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This may be good blogging, but it&#8217;s really not good journalism, and I hope that people do not confuse one for the other in this case. A blog can be pure opinion, and this one is, but it does not offer compelling or tangible evidence that went into forming that opinion, which Edge&#8217;s review does.\u00c2\u00a0Nobody trusts a review outlet that simply says &#8220;because we say so,&#8221; but you do have that luxury when commenting on reviews. A critic of the critics doesn&#8217;t have to show their work.\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I think you have to take all blogs and similar editorial columns with the knowledge that they are even more pure personal opinion than a review. And that includes this one.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week&#8217;s scathing gaming editorial comes from PSXExtreme. Ben Dutka wrote a response to Edge magazine&#8217;s Killzone 2 review. Edge is notoriously harsh in its reviews, but many people did not expect a 7 out of 10. Ben&#8217;s rebuttal is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/?p=672\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/672"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=672"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/672\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":674,"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/672\/revisions\/674"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bunnyears.net\/dan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}