Why is this 900-Diggworthy news when it was on page 62 of OXM’s March 2007 issue, which came out in early February? This thrilling information is two months old, and their version lacks quotes from the development team.
Maybe it’s not that print is dead; maybe it’s that online journalists aren’t paying attention to all their potential sources. How about we give each other credit where it’s due, huh?
This secret bias against print doesn’t make sense, and I’m getting tired of it, if not cranky about it.